So the food-loving online community is apparently in an uproar over this little word. After poking around, I’ve concluded there are 3 main camps:
1: Those who wear it as a badge of slightly-silly honor, “I love good food, and I think knowing about food is neat!”
2: Those who think the word “Foodie” is too silly. “Why are we putting -ie on the ends of words? Goofballs.”
3: Those who’ve come to know the word in a negative light. “Saying you’re a foodie is saying you’re a horrific food snob.”
I belong firmly in the first group, and kind of stare in surprised wonder at the other two. Camp #2 doesn’t upset me much. The existance of camp #3 bothers me quite a bit. Clearly, there have been some obnoxious and stuck-up people in certain parts of the country walking around calling themselves “foodie” and it’s tainted the word for huge swathes of the population. Shame, I say! Shame!
Early on in the word’s popularity, I looked up the definition on the web. It was difficult to find these same articles now, since there has been a veritable explosion of discussion on the topic, but I finally rooted them out for reference in this post. http://www.slashfood.com/2006/02/10/what-is-a-foodie-anyway/ A rather long quote from the above short article:
“To be a foodie is not only to like food, but to be interested in it. Just as a good student will have a thirst for knowledge, a foodie wants to learn about food. A foodie will never answer the question “What are you eating” with “I don’t know.” There are some basic traits of being a foodie, as there are basic traits that come with all labels. Generally, you have to know what you like, why you like it, recognize why some foods are better than others and want to have good tasting food all or certainly most of the time. This doesn’t mean that you can’t eat “Flaming Hot Cheetos” every now and again, but it does mean that you don’t fool yourself into thinking that it’s a nutritionally balanced meal.”
This was published in 2006. Here is an excerpt from http://www.foodieprints.com/item/167/catid/22 , published in mid-2007:
“Like gourmets, foodies collectively can make or break a restaurant. They have created a large complement of blogs, wikis, and even magazines where large online and off line communities pour over reviews. However, foodies will embark on activities that gourmets will not. For instance, foodies will spend time looking for the “perfect” taco or hamburger, honest everyday foods. Whereas, self-identified gourmets find such pursuits beneath them.”
I consider this to be the essence of the matter. A gourmet, just like a foodie, COULD be a snob. Doesn’t have to be! He or she may simply be well-off and addicted to the traditional finer foods available in high-end restaurants, and be a super-nice person. But it’s possible for a foodie to be inappropriately aloof also. Just the same as anyone. I don’t believe that any of the words in question: gourmet, foodie, epicure, etc. should immediately bring bile-inducing snobbery to mind.
Anyone can be a snooty jackass, their love for food is not an indicator one way or the other. I am not aware of a term that refers only to the snobby sector of food lovers. But as commented in the above quotes, gourmets are more interested in traditional and ‘refined’ food, for the most part, whereas the Foodie is interested in a wide range of food topics, to include both Smoked Salmon Pate and/or the most fabulous tasting elephant ear at the fair and what type of oil is used to fry it.
In my opinion, foodies (And gourmets, for that matter) may or may not be occupied with the actual preparation of foods. You don’t have to be skilled in food prep to be either one. But it is often the case! I’m good with cooking and baking, and it seems that many Foodies are. After all, if you have an opinion about the right way to do something… and if you want something done right…. you do it yourself! Heh.
Here is a blog post about the title “foodie” and why this chap has decided that he doesn’t like foodies, or the term. It seems like he’s determined that the amazingness of food should be played down, and that social and economic concerns in developing countries should prevent westerners from romanticizing and writing cookbooks about said country’s cuisine. He’s clearly got a lot more going on than just disliking the term “foodie”, but it is a good example, I think, of the stigma that a lot of people feel is attached to the title. http://mightyminnow.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/dawn-of-the-foodies-americas-most-obnoxious-clique/ Here’s an excerpt:
“Of course, you will never see a foodie at the local Sudanese joint—which, by the way is where I spend most of my time—banging on about how zesty, moist, and tender the lamb is. You will catch a foodie nowhere near the Sierra Leonean place asking whether the fufu is made from yams, plantains, or cassava (my favorite), and which of the three is best. No! The foodie would not be caught dead anywhere near where real people eat.”
I find these statements to be completely off the mark, because not one foodie I know (or have heard of online) wouldn’t leap at the chance to try Sudanese food, or, if they had the blessing of knowing the various ingredient variations of fufu, wouldn’t cheerfully ask which was used, and subsequently devour it with relish! Being a foodie is about being hungry to know more about food, and cuisine that comes from a different culture is treated with special respect and particularly keen interest! It’s also interesting that the foodie definitions he cites at the bottom of the article, though, do not seem to strongly support his assertions that foodies are melodramatic ethnocentric snobs.
Camp #3: Simmer down some! It’s very likely not your fault that you have a bad impression of the word. But this is something that a great many people consider to be great fun (Fresh new title!), a friendly and bright interest that involves zero snobbery, and if the word is a tad silly sounding, hey – – We’re cool with that, you know? (Camp #2, that bit’s for you guys!)
I am a foodie. I’m proud to wear the title, even if I risk being assumed a snob by some, -I truly hope the stigma will wear off with time. In the meantime, I will do my best to model the correct, accepting, and fun-loving meaning of the term. Thanks for reading!
Foodie definition What is a foodie What does foodie mean
I wrote this note to a friend of mine, she’d heard from other friends that she’d be smart to stop reading the Twilight Saga after book one, because the rest of the story was a disappointment. These are my thoughts on the matter.
Book 2 is, I believe, the root of the problem that some people may have with the rest of the series. The tone of book two is drastically different than the light and giddy tone of book 1.
The story in book two deals with loss, heartbreak, apathy, betrayal, and numb sadness for the first 3/4 of the book. For someone who has ever gone through something very difficult, relationally, it is very difficult to read and maintain objectivity. I have, and I found it hard to read and stay upbeat. It hit too close to home, one might say.
I gave the series to a little girl this year for Christmas, it was her Christmas Wish. The series is all the rage among her peers right now, and she wants in on the clique. I wrote on the title page of the second book, along with Christmas wishes, that she shouldn’t be discouraged from finishing the book because the tone is so gray. Finish if off, I encouraged, it ends happy.
Because it does. The redemption is fantastic, and is made complete at the end of the series, book four.
I had no problems with the writing style, and saw no difference in writing quality across the four books.
The awe and wonder I felt as I turned the last pages were more than enough to justify the emotional difficulty I had in getting through book 2 in one piece.
Another thing to note is that the author has very good information on her personal website, on each of the books, talking about various writing and publishing issues, including cut bits and outtakes of sorts. She speaks of focus groups reading book 2 before publishing. She urged them to read it twice. Because the first time through, the impulse (I felt it too) was to skip through the pages until the good feelings came back, thus missing the beauty and redemption of an important part of the story. I read this comment of hers after having already read through book 2 and 3, and I emphatically agreed with her sentiment. Give book two the benefit of the doubt, it is redeeming in the end, slow down and experience it for what it is!
Ok, just wanted to get that off my chest! Hehe.
I do love the series, the story, the characters, the world she’s created with a passion, but I’d like to think it’s not the same sort of passion as the 12 to 16 years set. *grin*
If you still don’t read them, that’s your prerogative, clearly, but I’ve had my say!
I’m excited about my Etsy shop! It’s only twenty cents to list something there, for 4 months! That’s basically forever. And you can list something as an example, and if someone wants one, they can buy it, and THEN you make it for them! No wasting time creating inventory that maybe nobody will want! Visit my store and see what it’s all about!